CLIMATE CHANGE CAUSES ESWATINI FLOODS

This week, the Kingdom of Eswatini witnessed devastating floods that have left many families displaced and without shelter.

The tragic events are not isolated but rather part of a broader and escalating pattern of extreme weather events fuelled by climate change. The Government of Eswatini, along with the global community, must recognise this disaster as a clarion call for urgent action and investment in climate change mitigation, prevention and education.

The increase in frequency and intensity of extreme weather events such as floods, droughts and hurricanes is one of the most vivid manifestations of climate change. This long-term shift from the weather pattern results from a warming planet, driven by the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Therefore, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) underscores the need for all countries, especially vulnerable ones, to prepare and adapt to these impacts.

Climate change policy
The Swaziland (Eswatini) National Climate Change Policy aims to reduce the country’s carbon footprint and build resilience to climate change.
The policy includes strategies for adaptation, mitigation and public awareness. The objectives of this policy are to provide enabling policy framework for effective implementation of climate change adaptation and mitigation measures. It also seeks to enhance climate-resilient and inclusive low-carbon green growth investments, promote public education, information and awareness on climate change and provide mechanisms for coordination and building of partnerships in addressing climate change.

Globally, we are witnessing significant climatic shifts that have economic, environmental, and social implications. The global economy is being stretched by the costs associated with disaster response and recovery, economic disruptions from agricultural losses, and the strain on infrastructure. I must emphasise that the economic repercussions of climate change are profound. They include decreased agricultural output, increased health costs, displacement and destruction of infrastructure. I pray such catastrophe does not affect the land of honey and milk - Eswatini.

My prayer is founded on an analysis by the World Bank, which has estimated that, without significant action, climate change could push over 100 million people into poverty by 2030. I have observed that countries across the world are experiencing these effects, although the contributions to global emissions vary. The United States, under President Donald Trump, notably withdrew from the Paris Agreement, indicating a rollback in climate action commitments.

The first tenure of Trump as president of the United States began on January 20, 2017 and ended on January 20, 2021. His second tenure after a four-year break begins on January 20, 2025. Trump’s stance on climate change shifted with the change in administration in 2021, as USA rejoined the agreement under President Joe Biden, highlighting the global need for consistent and forward-thinking policies. The largest greenhouse gas emitters include China, the United States, India and European Union countries.

While these economies have made some commitments to reduce emissions and transition to renewable energy, progress is staggered. The European Union is generally favoured for its comprehensive climate policies, while China and India have pledged significant emission cuts as part of the Paris Agreement, despite their ongoing reliance on coal. These countries have not done much to compensate the least developed nations that are suffering from the impact of climate change.  

Climate resilience
The situation in Eswatini demands immediate action not only in terms of humanitarian aid and housing for those affected but also in allocating substantial budgets towards climate resilience. I am happy that the Eswatini Government Programme of Action seeks to address the issue of climate change. Government has proposed for a budget of E60 billion for climate change mitigation and other related actions.
According to the Eswatini National Climate Change Policy, direct funding through the annual national budgets will remain inadequate.

However, under the UNFCCC, developed countries are obligated to provide financial support to developing countries like Eswatini to support adaptation and mitigation actions. In this regard, several climate finance mechanisms have been established under the Convention and its Kyoto Protocol. These include the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and the Adaptation Fund. In addition to the funds under the Convention and its Kyoto Protocol, other climate finance mechanisms exist such as the Global Environment Facility (GEF).

It is mentioned in the country’s policy that the World Bank and through other multilateral, bilateral and private sector sources, including carbon market education on climate change impacts and adaptive strategies should be prioritised to empower communities to respond effectively. Globally, I want to mention that we must bolster our commitment to reducing emissions, transitioning to sustainable energy sources, and investing in technology and infrastructure that can withstand extreme weather events.

Individual actions such as reducing carbon footprints, supporting sustainable practices and advocating for policy changes are essential.
The unfortunate disaster that we have witnessed this week in the country is a solemn reminder that without comprehensive and coordinated action on climate change, the world will face increasingly severe catastrophes. In a nutshell, countries under the UN framework must incorporate climate change into their action programmes, ensuring a sustainable and resilient future for all.

PR is part of politics  
In today’s dynamic political landscape, the role of publicity has evolved into a powerful tool for politicians to reach their constituents. Public relations (PR) initiatives are often met with criticism and sceptism yet they remain an essential component of political strategy. These manoeuvres, while at times theatrical, are gateways to effective communication and public engagement. Some social media users, mainly members of the progressives have been criticising Deputy Prime Minister(DPM) Thuli Dladla for performing a PR stunt by building homes for the underprivileged families. What do people want? What quality of a brain would criticise such a useful societal programme?

Let us say it is a PR function, what is wrong with it? Dladla must continue to exemplify how strategic PR campaigns not only capture attention, but also address pressing societal needs, such as housing for the underprivileged. At its core, publicity attracts public and media attention. In politics, PR initiatives are indispensable, especially during campaign seasons.

They serve as a megaphone, amplifying political messages that might otherwise be lost in the cacophony of modern-day media. More than mere spectacle, they symbolise the accessible nature of politics, encouraging public dialogue and interaction. Politicians who master the art of the PR find themselves in an advantageous position to influence public opinion and votes. Once an individual steps into the political arena, survival often hinges on the ability to effectively campaign and execute strategic PR initiatives.

These strategies are woven into the fabric of modern governance, allowing public figures to spotlight their policies and commitments intensely. Critics often describe the construction of houses for underprivileged emaSwati by the DPM a publicity stunt. However, such interpretations overlook the deeper impact of these initiatives.

Dladla, like all politicians, understands the primary goal of attracting public attention as a way to showcase government priorities and spur community involvement. Her efforts demonstrate how well-orchestrated PR initiatives can translate into tangible benefits for the populace. Building homes for the poor reflects a vital government function—restoring social order and combating inequality.

Addressing these deeply ingrained issues requires more than rhetoric. It demands visible action. By providing shelter to disadvantaged citizens, Dladla and her government help dismantle the barriers keeping many in poverty.  Initiatives like hers echo successful models seen in countries such as Brazil’s ‘Minha Casa, Minha Vida’ programmes and South Africa’s Reconstruction and Development Programme, both of which have extensively addressed housing crises and inequality.

The importance of constructing homes for the underprivileged cannot be overstated. Secure housing is foundational to improving quality of life, offering stability that enables families to pursue education, employment and better health outcomes. It serves as a pivot for social reform, reducing crime, bolstering economies, and fostering community growth.  Countries worldwide have leveraged housing initiatives to address inequality. As stated above, in Brazil, government programmes emphasised affordable housing as a tool for socio-economic transformation.

Governmental responsibility
Similarly, South Africa made significant strides post-apartheid by focusing on housing as part of its broader social policy. These examples offer compelling evidence for why housing for the poor must remain a priority. Given the success of these international models, the efforts by the office of the DPM deserve commendation. Dladla’s approach not only highlights the government’s commitment to its citizens, but also sets a precedent for other nations grappling with similar challenges.

While such initiatives can be powerful, it is crucial that they are underpinned by rigorous policy frameworks and government support. I want to emphasise this point that building homes for the poor is inherently a governmental responsibility. Long-term success requires thorough research to identify communities most in need and a robust budgetary commitment, both of which demand parliamentary approval. Parliament’s role is vital in ensuring that these initiatives are not ad-hoc but part of an integrated strategy to combat poverty.

Government institutions must work collaboratively, alongside NGOs, to maximise impact. It is godly to recognise non-governmental organisations (NGOs) that play a crucial role in complementing government efforts. In Eswatini, organisations such as the Philani Maswati Charity Organisation, Scalisa Foundation and Prince Sicalo Foundation have been instrumental in constructing homes for the underprivileged.

Their dedication and hard work amplify government efforts, ensuring that housing initiatives are comprehensive and far-reaching. These NGOs have laid vital groundwork, ensuring that assistance reaches those who need it most. Their experience and networks provide invaluable support to government initiatives, creating a synergistic effect that increases efficiency and outreach. The commendable work of these organisations deserves recognition and continued support. In conclusion, the intersection of politics and publicity is a complex yet necessary component of modern governance.

By strategically combining PR with purposeful action, politicians can promote social change, drawing attention to issues that demand collective resolve. Societies that embrace and understand the role of publicity in politics can harness this as a force for good, channelling attention and resources toward meaningful reform. We must celebrate and support these initiatives.

Post your comment

Your name:

Your e-mail address:

Add your comments:

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Image:

Code: