KING WANTS TO HEAR TRUTH

During the national prayer service to mark the start of the year, hosted at Mandvulo Grand Hall at Lozitha, His Majesty King Mswati III addressed a critical issue that may have escaped the attention or priority of some individuals.

The King highlighted the tendency for certain individuals to provide leaders with information that aligns with what they wish to hear, neglecting the importance of honesty. His Majesty highlighted the adverse effects of deception on leaders. It is commendable that His Majesty made such a profound statement, particularly amid concerns that he was surrounded by individuals who were less than candid.

This assertion demonstrates the King’s desire for transparency and truth. The head of State is unequivocal in his pursuit of truth that contributes to the nation’s advancement, recognising that dishonesty hinders progress.
Wisdom upholds truth, emphasising the necessity of conveying truths respectfully.

There are instances where individuals convey truths in a disparaging manner, overshadowing the essence of the message. Historical references can be made to leaders who reprimanded advisors for falsehoods and, conversely, those who rewarded advisors for providing sound counsel. Leadership thrives on honesty and integrity, and it is imperative to acknowledge and appreciate those who uphold these values.

Leaders

Throughout history, there have been numerous instances where leaders have either reprimanded advisors for dishonesty or rewarded them for offering sound advice. One notable example of a leader who rebuked advisors for deceit is Emperor Qin Shi Huang of China. Known for his strict governance, he famously punished advisors who misled him with severe consequences, fostering an environment of accountability and truthfulness within his court.

Conversely, there are also leaders who have recognised and rewarded advisors for providing genuine and valuable guidance. Queen Elizabeth I of England is a prime example of a leader who appreciated honest counsel. She surrounded herself with trusted advisors who were unafraid to speak truth to power, and she rewarded them for their loyalty and integrity.

Their counsel played a crucial role in the success of her reign. Moving forward in history, President Abraham Lincoln of the United States is another leader known for valuing honest advice. Despite facing immense challenges during his presidency, Lincoln sought counsel from diverse perspectives and rewarded advisors who offered thoughtful and truthful guidance. His ability to listen to differing opinions and make informed decisions based on sound advice contributed to his legacy as a great leader.

The examples of these leaders who have rebuked dishonest advisors and rewarded those who provided genuine advice serve as timeless lessons in effective leadership. These historical instances highlight the importance of surrounding oneself with trusted advisors who are committed to truth and integrity, ultimately leading to better decision-making and governance.

With regard to the issue of Prince Magudvulela and the China trip, I still wonder if Ingwenyama was told the truth. I pose this critical question because I know the prince to be a loyalist of the royal family and institution of the monarchy. The Prince Magudvulela I have known for 30 years could die for the King.

I was privileged to sit in meetings of the National Development Strategy (NDS), which were chaired by the late Meshack Shongwe, who also served as the Principal Secretary in the Ministry of Finance. Prince Magudvulela was a member of the stakeholders who participated in devising the NDS. The late Prince Mahlaba was also there. As a young man, I was allowed to sit as an observer even though I was a reporter.

China

Meetings were held at Pigg’s Peak Hotel. Again, modern China has no history for wars and for hundreds of years Beijing had never participated in any war or civil unrest. I doubt it would ever attack Taiwan, except issuing threats or making war rumours to unsettle Taipei.

That China wanted to destabilise Eswatini may, if historical facts are to be considered, raise questions than answers. Why would China destabilise a small country like Eswatini and not do same with Taiwan, its key trading partner?
As a student of politics, I am left with political questions.

Post your comment

Your name:

Your e-mail address:

Add your comments:

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Image:

Code: