Times Of Swaziland: FREEDOM OF SPEECH NON-EXISTENT

FREEDOM OF SPEECH NON-EXISTENT
================================================================================
Alex Nxumalo on 29/09/2024 14:33:00


The current Minister of Information, Communications and Technology (ICT),
Savannah Maziya, appears to possess the qualities necessary to be regarded as
one of the most insightful, astute and forward-thinking ministers in the history
of the crown.
I found her gracious and mature responses during a recent interview she had with
this newspaper, following the widely publicised disturbances at the recent
Editors Forum Breakfast Meeting, to be particularly engaging. Maziya accentuated
the interdependence of the media and government, indicating that both entities
can coexist harmoniously, while fostering mutual understanding and respect. This
concept is the central theme of today’s discussion.In an article featured in
last week’s edition of this publication, Minister Maziya articulated these
significant views during her interview, which aimed to outline her plans and new
initiatives introduced by her ministry, since her appointment last year.
She stated, “I know we will (work together with the media, I presume) because
if we all claim to really love this country, and want the best for it, it is
incumbent for us to figure out a way to meet in the centre. It does not serve
anybody if we all go to our corners. We have to meet at the centre. We are
almost like divorced parents so we have got to do what is best for the child.
The child is the country.” This statement is indeed profound, perceptive and
very discerning.While some may perceive her comments as superficial, I interpret
them as conveying a significant, subtle, yet emphatic message: There exists a
degree of tension between certain factions of the government she serves and the
media, and it is crucial to set aside self-serving, egotistical attitudes, in
order to rebuild a constructive relationship between the media and the
government, for the benefit of the nation.
Provoke
She, essentially, suggested that patriotism should take precedence over personal
ambition, which has been a contributing factor to the disconnect between our
leaders, the media and the populace. It is important to clarify that the purpose
of this article is not to revisit past grievances or to provoke new ones,
depending on one’s perspective, but rather to build upon the insightful
remarks made by Minister Maziya. To be candid, I believe, and I am confident
that many share this view based on the comments I have observed, particularly on
social media, that the Editor’s Breakfast Meeting was poorly managed,
especially by the prime minister (PM) of the country.
His replies to certain inquiries from the editors present were lacking in
substance and clarity. It is important that we strive to be honest with words
and intentions in our criticism and not be praise-singers of attitudes that have
the propensity to create conflicts. The PM’s responses to questions
specifically raised by Mr. Martin Dlamini, the Managing Editor of the Eswatini
Times, were perceived as condescending and sarcastic. For the sake of progress,
I will refrain from reiterating some of these responses, as they left many
feeling discontented and disillusioned.
It is crucial to understand that one of the duties of journalists is not to take
sides or reflect biases, only reporting favourably about the administration,
institution or individual. Journalistic ethics demand that journalists must also
report about any wrongdoings of the administration, including the other arms of
government. For any politician to accuse the media of always reporting
negatively about the institution he/she represents or heads is a show of naivety
and a lack of understanding of the duties of the media. While it is acknowledged
that Bheki Makhubu of the Nation Magazine, known for his forthright and
no-holds-barred journalistic approach, may have crossed a line with his
seemingly disrespectful questioning of the prime minister, it is crucial to
consider the broader context.
We must examine what might have provoked his intense remarks directed at the
prime minister. Makhubu’s demeanour suggested a deeply frustrated media
professional seeking substantial answers from the Prime Minister. His now widely
discussed phrases, “kantsi sikwenteni,” and, “who do you think you are”
respectively, reflected his frustration over issues that warranted serious
attention. Undoubtedly, there exists significant public discontent regarding the
way the current administration executes its responsibilities.  The nation is
currently facing numerous controversies that have created a rift between the
administration and the general populace.
It is no secret that the populace is frustrated with the country’s government.
The administration has to conduct an honest, soul-searching and introspective
analysis as to WHY? If and when it takes up the gauntlet I am throwing at it, it
must then collectively work together towards regaining the eroded public’s
trust in it. If not, then... Lord help us! Consider, for instance, the pervasive
issue of corruption.
Corruption remains a significant issue that has a firm grip on the country.
Despite the administration’s assurances to eliminate corrupt practices, it
persists seemingly without interruption. It is widely acknowledged that serious
allegations of corruption underlie many of the challenges, particularly the drug
shortage plaguing the health sector. The individuals allegedly implicated in
these unethical activities are reportedly well-known, yet they continue to
operate as if it is business as usual.
Several months ago, the legislative branch of government expressed grave
concerns regarding allegations of selective targeting by the institutions tasked
with investigating and apprehending those suspected of engaging in corrupt
activities. Secondly, one of the key sectors - education - is also facing
difficulties. Among the challenges faced by this sector are allegations of food
shortages in schools, which have raised significant concerns.  Although, the
administration has promised that food supplies are being delivered to schools,
the reality on the ground according to schools’ administrators, tells a
different story.
Challenges
The judiciary, one of the most crucial branches of government, is grappling with
numerous challenges, with corruption allegations being a major issue. The prime
minister missed an opportunity to ease the tensions among editors, such as
Makhubu, by choosing to adopt a condescending demeanour. Rather than responding
to inquiries with a composed and reassuring attitude, indicating that his
administration is actively addressing the myriad problems facing the country, he
instead appeared sarcastic in his replies. My observations may not be entirely
accurate, but the responses in question did not exemplify the best standards of
decorum. Specifically, accusing the Eswatini Times newspaper of frequently
reporting unfavourably about the government represents a clear instance of
below-the-belt criticism. The threat to leave if the microphone was handed to
the editor of Nation Magazine was unexpected behaviour from an individual of the
Prime Minister’s stature.
While it is understandable that he felt justified in his anger towards
Makhubu’s infamous remarks, “who do you think you are,” a more composed
approach could have been beneficial. He might have advised Makhubu that such a
tone was inappropriate for someone of his media experience, and responded (PM)
in a manner that would have encouraged Makhubu to adopt a calmer demeanour. In a
democracy, politicians are expected to be accountable to the public they serve. 
Criticism and scrutiny from the media and the electorate are inherent aspects of
the political landscape. Effective leadership requires the ability to remain
composed and objective when faced with tough questioning or harsh criticism.
Reacting with petulance or by threatening to disengage from the process simply
because one’s ego has been bruised, is a clear indicator of a lack of
leadership skills and acumen. Truly adept political leaders must possess the
capacity to confront challenging situations head-on, handle them with a deft and
measured approach, and emerge from the fray with their dignity and credibility
intact. Maintaining composure, listening to diverse viewpoints, and addressing
concerns in a constructive manner are hallmarks of strong and capable
leadership.
Perhaps it is important that I clarify some of the duties of the media in order
to help those who may not be enlightened enough or are not privy to the duties
of the media. It is important to provide a brief overview of the media’s role
and responsibilities in this context. The media plays a very crucial watchdog
function, holding those in power accountable and ensuring transparency in the
political or otherwise process. While their questioning may at times be intense
or confrontational, this is a necessary part of their duty to the public.
Understanding and respecting the media’s role is essential for politicians who
seek to effectively navigate the complexities of the political arena.
The media holds a pivotal position in a democratic society, acting as an
essential conduit between the government, the public, and the dissemination of
information. As the fourth estate, the media is charged with the role of a
watchdog, ensuring accountability among those in power and examining their
actions. This obligation to inform and educate the public is not merely a
professional ethical standard, but also a cornerstone of a functioning
democracy. It is regrettable that the current state of democracy in this country
leaves much to be desired. In fact, I would dare anyone to convince me if what
transpired at the breakfast meeting, including the known suppression of
constitutional rights of citizens, such as freedom of speech, association, etc.,
is a reflection of true democracy.
In an era marked by increasing misinformation and division, the media’s duty
to report facts accurately becomes even more imperative. By adhering to the
principles of impartiality and objectivity, the media can empower citizens to
make informed choices, encourage critical thinking, and foster a collective
understanding of intricate issues. Avoiding biases and partisan interests is
crucial to providing the public with a balanced and thorough perspective on
events, allowing them to form their own views and engage in substantive
discussions. The media’s duties are numerous, but due to space constraints, I
will leave it here. Now, let me quickly conclude this piece by addressing
another deeply perturbing subject (I plead with my editor to indulge me.)
The recent rumblings from the corridors of power have been sending shockwaves
through the media landscape. Whispers of the administration’s alleged
intentions to tighten the reins on the free press - in simpler terms, regulate
the media -have set off alarm bells across the nation. If these ominous rumours
prove to be true, it would represent a grave threat to the very foundation of
our democratic principles – the freedom of the press. I implore whoever is
behind these purported moves, to heed this solemn warning: STOP RIGHT THERE AND
DROP THE MOVES! The media, as the fourth estate, plays a vital role in keeping
the public informed, holding the government accountable, and safeguarding the
delicate balance of power in our society. Any attempt to undermine this critical
function, would be a blatant disregard for the fundamental rights and freedoms
that our nation was built upon.
Dedication
The free flow of information, the diversity of voices, and the unwavering
commitment to the truth are the cornerstones of a thriving democracy. Tampering
with these pillars would be a perilous path; one that could lead us down a dark
road of censorship, manipulation, and the erosion of the public’s trust.  I
urge the powers that be to reconsider this course of action and instead,
reaffirm their dedication to the principles of transparency, accountability, and
the inviolable right of the press to report without fear or favour. The
potential for media regulation goes beyond just issues of censorship and biased
reporting. It has significant implications for the marketplace of ideas, where
the free exchange of information and viewpoints is essential for a healthy
democracy.
When media is restricted, the public’s ability to access diverse perspectives
and make informed decisions is hindered, leading to a narrowing of public
discourse and the danger of power becoming concentrated in the hands of a few.
In conclusion, I urge that the Editors Forum, along with media professionals,
must proactively resist any attempts to regulate or control the media. This
resistance can take various forms, including public advocacy, legal challenges,
and maintaining ethical standards in journalism. By standing firm in their
commitment to independent and unbiased reporting, the media can send a strong
message that attempts to undermine press freedom will not be tolerated.
Peace! Shalom! Wishing you a great week ahead.
Comments -7605 8449