Times Of Swaziland: COURT ALLOWS CELLPHONE MESSAGES IN EX-EBIS DIRECTOR’S ESTATE COURT ALLOWS CELLPHONE MESSAGES IN EX-EBIS DIRECTOR’S ESTATE ================================================================================ Mlondzi Nkambule on 13/02/2025 09:50:00 MBABANE - In a peculiar move, the court has directed the use of cellphone messages for the distribution of the estate of the late former EBIS Director, Welile Dlamini. This decision marks a significant departure from traditional estate distribution methods and raises interesting questions about the validity of digital communication in legal matters. The order was issued by High Court Judge John Magagula and respondents in the matter were the master of the High Court and attorney general. Dlamini, who passed away in August 2024, left behind an estate valued at E2.1 million, comprising cash and assets, including a three-bedroom house, a car and funds in various bank accounts. According to WhatsApp messages and an unsigned will purportedly written by Dlamini, he bequeathed most of his assets to his nephew, Philakwezwe Khumalo, who had been his caregiver for many years. These messages, which were previously rejected by the master of the High Court, have now been deemed admissible by the court, paving the way for the estate to be distributed according to Dlamini’s wishes, as expressed in his digital communications. In his court application, Khumalo mentioned that the former director of Eswatini Broadcasting and Information Services’ (EBIS) parents and siblings passed away several years ago. Paralysed Khumalo pointed out that his uncle had a disability, paralysed for most of his life and relied on a wheelchair for mobility. “I lived with my uncle, taking care of him, considering his confinement to a wheelchair. Needless to say, he required constant attention and medical care due to his ill-health,” Khumalo submitted. He further contended that his uncle, being elderly and with disability, needed constant assistance. Khumalo described himself as his uncle’s nephew and right-hand man for a long time. The applicant mentioned that his late uncle’s estate was reported to the master of the High Court. According to Khumalo, during his lifetime, his uncle prepared a last Will and testament outlining how his estate should be distributed. The master of the High Court rejected the will on the grounds that it did not comply with the requirements of the Wills Act of 1932 and advised Khumalo to seek a declaratory order from the High Court. Khumalo claimed that his uncle executed the Will on August 5, 2024, before a lawyer. In the purported Will, which is attached to the court documents filed by Khumalo against the Master of the High Court, Dlamini allegedly wrote: “I nominate and appoint Philakwezwe Khumalo to be the executor and inheritor of my estate as a token of appreciation for looking after me while I was alive. My family abandoned me when I needed them most after an operation that left me confined to a wheelchair due to the negligence of doctors at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital in South Africa.” The impugned Will also highlights Khumalo’s role as a companion, particularly in sharing Dlamini’s passion for music. It states: “Khumalo, a music lover, drove me to Johannesburg on numerous occasions to attend music shows by various artists, including Brian Culbertson, the O’Jays, Earl Klugh, Fourplay, Bebe and Cece Winans, Gladys Knight, Hugh Masekela, and Salif Keita.” The Will concludes with a heartfelt message: “Khumalo, please continue to look after the vulnerable members of society. May the Lord God Almighty bless you abundantly.” According to a legal expert, when a person dies without a valid Will, they are said to have died intestate. In such cases, the distribution of their estate is governed by the laws of intestate succession, which are based on Roman-Dutch law in Eswatini. He said: “These laws typically prioritise close family members, such as spouses and children, as the primary beneficiaries of the estate. If there are no surviving close relatives, the estate may be distributed among more distant relatives or, in some cases, may escheat to the State.” In this case, he said the court’s decision suggests a willingness to adapt to the changing realities of communication and to recognise the potential for digital messages to convey testamentary intentions. He said this decision could have far-reaching implications for estate law in Eswatini and may serve as a precedent for future cases involving digital Wills. “The High Court’s decision to admit the WhatsApp messages as evidence of the deceased’s testamentary intentions represents a significant development in Eswatini’s estate law. Traditionally, strict adherence to the formalities of the Wills Act has been required. However, the court’s decision suggests a move towards a more flexible approach, recognising that testamentary intent can be expressed in various forms, including digital communication,” he said.