Times Of Swaziland: WHERE ARE THE ACTIVISTS, AMID CHALLENGES? WHERE ARE THE ACTIVISTS, AMID CHALLENGES? ================================================================================ Emmanuel Ndlangamandla on 15/07/2024 08:12:00 Civil Society including the non-governmental organisations, trade unions, faith-based organisations in Eswatini, have made their mark in various spaces and levels as they attempt to push for the respect, protection, promotion and fulfilment of human rights in our country. This has been pursued through various mechanisms including offering direct assistance to the vulnerable groups, generating evidence, conducting civic education, engaging government through dialogues, workshops and campaigns, to mention a few. Advocacy and activism though related, differ in some aspects. Advocacy is often thought of as ‘an act of publicly representing an individual, organisation or idea’ and used as an umbrella term for many intervention tools. It can include active lobbying, including methods such as: Letter writing, meeting politicians, running public forums, questions in Parliament and participating in various consultative processes. Reputation Activism, on the other hand, often has a less favourable reputation even though by definition, it can be viewed as a form of advocacy. Activism is described as taking direct action to achieve a social goal. (Stephen Hall, 2018). ‘Activism’ can be a negative concept based on how activism is perceived and how activists are depicted by the state and its systems and or agencies such as the media and the legal framework. Activism can be seen as part of the advocacy process or the action(s) that advocates take, such as organise a deliberate and direct protest, to increase awareness and attempt to influence the political process. In summing up, advocacy is often seen as working ‘within the system’ whereas activism is seen as working ‘outside the system’ to generate change. Eswatini is going though serious socio-economic and governance challenges. Worth noting is that Eswatini has scored low in the Mo Ibrahim Governance Index, scoring 49 out of a 100 in overall governance, ranking 35 out of 54 countries. The Mo Ibrahim Foundation defines governance as “the provision of the political, social, economic and environmental public goods that every citizen has the right to expect from their state, and that a state has the responsibility to deliver to its citizens”. Threat Even with the new administration following national elections, poverty levels continue to worsen, unemployment especially among the youth at around 58 per cent persist, the nexus of corruption and nepotism remains a public concern, control of media and threat to control social media space through cyber legislation remain a major threat to freedom of expression, deepening health crisis, looming hunger triggered by the Elnino phenomenon, inequality , gender-based violence and gender disparities to mention a few. These problems are affecting emaSwati children, women, youth, elderly, disabled and men as well. Unfortunately, those affected have no voice as there are no platforms to voice their issues. Even the elected members of Parliament are not compelled to host constituency meeting to listen to those who voted for them. It is concerning that since the brutal quelling of the 2021 civil unrest, which claimed dozens of lives of emaSwati, including a prominent activist and lawyer, activism in Eswatini seems to have taken a back seat largely due to fear of reprisals from an uncompromising security organs of State. Why civil society activism is critical? The Eswatini governance system is based on individual merit. To this end, there is no opposition voice in Parliament. Of course the system is founded on the belief that multiparty system is fundamentally divisive and, hence, the architects designed a system where members of Parliament should to a large extent should be seen to be pulling together. The reality is that if politicians are not pressured to address the socio-economic challenges facing society, the tendency is that they ignore the issues and hence they persist. If I may ask, why should the drugs shortage crisis be persisting even when the issue was raised at Sibaya? Why does it persist even with the new administration charged by His Majesty to address national challenges with speed ‘nkwe’? Why did the Cabinet Task Team fail to turn things around? The Right Honourable Prime Minister established a high level task team to address rampant corruption after His Majesty called for those who are involved in corruption to be held accountable. To date, no one has been prosecuted. Why? Civil society is, therefore, seen as an increasingly important agent for promoting good governance like transparency, effectiveness, openness, responsiveness and accountability; civil society has a role in enabling the voiceless and unorganised community’s interests to be represented; civil Society engage in policy analysis and in the design of strategies; it monitors government performance as well as actions and behaviour of public officials; civil society also build social capital and enable citizen to identify and articulate their values, beliefs, civic norms and democratic practices. Civil society activist must find their voice again. Our country needs you!