Home | News | KHWAPHENI RESIDENT ARRESTED FOR DEFYING PRINCE LOGCOGCO

KHWAPHENI RESIDENT ARRESTED FOR DEFYING PRINCE LOGCOGCO

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

MANZINI – A resident of Khwapheni in Mafutseni has been arrested and charged for defying Prince Logcogco.


The senior prince, who is also Liqoqo Chairman, has taken one of his residents to court for holding meetings without his authority.
The resident is from one of the areas that fall directly under Gundvwini Royal Kraal.


The prince opened a case against Dumisani Dlamini (70) and he appeared before Principal Magistrate David Khumalo on Friday where he was charged with contravening Section 13 of the Swazi Administration Act 79 of 1950.
It was alleged that Dlamini was calling community meetings without getting authority from the prince who is an overseer of Khwapheni Royal Kraal.


During his appearance in court, Dlamini was represented by Titus Mlangeni. After the charge sheet was read to the accused person, Mlangeni applied for bail but the Crown opposed it.


However, there was confusion as the accused person thought that the bail application was not opposed and he walked out of the courtroom with his client. While they were in the corridors, police officers were instructed to keep the accused person in custody.


Mlangeni then asked the court to clarify the Crown’s reply on the bail application and it was said that the application was denied on the basis that there possibilities that a conflict could ensue if the accused person goes back to his place of residence.
Prosecutor Macebo Nxumalo from the DPP’s chambers said the bail application was opposed because it had been gathered that the accused person would interfere with the State witnesses.


“There is prove that the accused person would interfere with the state witnesses if he could be released on bail and there are possibilities that a conflict could ensue,” the prosecutor said.


Dlamini was remanded in custody until tomorrow when the crown would lead the court in evidence to prove that indeed the accused person would interfere with the State witnesses and that there were possibilities that a fight could ensue if Dlamini could go back to his place of residence.
This means that Dlamini will spend three days in custody before he appears in court again.

Comments (4 posted):

Annon on 24/03/2014 09:48:08
avatar
This is just not true, its simply a political or power conflict. these are not the reason behind the bail denial, as if it was serial murder case. A person is given strict conditions and orders to abide by and if he fails to stick to them then that person can be kept behind bars. if I may ask where is the prove that he "would interfere with state witnesses"? kube bekungimi ummangali ngabe umsolwa uhamba edolobheni manje.
MainGate on 24/03/2014 10:36:19
avatar
Its time we revisit our histoty books to checke whether the Dlaminis are not taking us back to the apartheid error.Mr Bantustanman hold your horses,the route to 2022 does not go that way.Only in a farm situation.
crizza bix on 24/03/2014 12:46:29
avatar
Now, that is what I call freedom of speech and freedom of assembly!
Muzi on 24/03/2014 13:32:19
avatar
Who walked away with who? the accused had a client?????

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image: